Investigations in the public interestEvidence. Enquiry. Accountability.
The Questions / COSTS-05

COSTS-05 · Mark John Mayo v Miss E / L00BP152

Why do the costs-record requests remain unresolved?

Unresolved according to the family

The question · editorial wording

What substantive response addresses the requests repeated in the 29 April 2026 final notice? Identify the date, recipient and supporting records for any response already given. If the requested documents or reasons have not been provided, explain what remains outstanding, who is responsible for responding and how the request will be resolved.

Why this matters Responsibility for an answer

Repeated requests for the basis of a financial order should lead to a traceable outcome. The continuing reported gap matters because it leaves the affected party unable to check the decision against its supporting record.

Current question directed to: His Honour Judge Paul Mitchell · case-specific records and response through the relevant court / HMCTS

Recipient of the related request in the supplied record
His Honour Judge Paul Mitchell
Related request in record
29 April 2026 · signed final notice
Sending of a new request by this publication
No new enquiry sent by this publication.

The supplied signed final notice is addressed to Judge Paul Mitchell and describes repeated requests exceeding one year. Mr J reports that these remain unanswered as of 15 September 2026. This page restates and specifies those requests; it is not a newly delivered enquiry from The Unanswered Record. The seven-day period in the letter was requested by its author, not imposed by this publication or identified as a court direction.

What the record answers

The reviewed final notice records the author’s position that no N260 or adequate explanation had been supplied. No substantive reply resolving these points has been provided to this publication. Mr J reports that the requests remain unresolved.

The point still requiring clarification

The family reports more than a year of requests without the substantive answer sought. Identify an existing answer or give a specific explanation and route to resolution; acknowledgement alone would not resolve the document question.

Final notice dated 29 April 2026 · family’s response position updated 15 September 2026. No live “days unanswered” count is used.

Where this question comes from

Court costs: the requests and final notice → Read the originating article

Supporting source notes: R, pp. 1–2.

Mark John Mayo v Miss E / L00BP152

Keep the record complete

Answer this question.

Any party with a response, correction or relevant document can contact theunansweredrecord@gmail.com. Quote COSTS-05 and identify the point and evidence you are addressing. Material replies will be considered and reflected fairly alongside the question.

Respond to COSTS-05 ↗