Investigations in the public interestEvidence. Enquiry. Accountability.
The Questions / COSTS-01

COSTS-01 · Mark John Mayo v Miss E / L00BP152

Judge Mitchell: what record supported the costs assessment?

Unresolved according to the family

The question · editorial wording

What N260 or equivalent signed costs statement was before you when costs were assessed following the 10 March 2025 hearing? Identify the document, its date and where it is held, and provide the available copy through the court. If no such statement was available, what other material supported the assessment and why did the court proceed on that basis?

Why this matters A traceable exercise of power

A financial order must be capable of explanation by reference to the material and reasoning used. The central issue is the basis of the assessment, not simply whether a document carries a particular form number.

Current question directed to: His Honour Judge Paul Mitchell · case-specific records and response through the relevant court / HMCTS

Recipient of the related request in the supplied record
His Honour Judge Paul Mitchell
Related request in record
29 April 2026 · signed final notice
Sending of a new request by this publication
No new enquiry sent by this publication.

The supplied signed final notice is addressed to Judge Paul Mitchell and describes repeated requests exceeding one year. Mr J reports that these remain unanswered as of 15 September 2026. This page restates and specifies those requests; it is not a newly delivered enquiry from The Unanswered Record. The seven-day period in the letter was requested by its author, not imposed by this publication or identified as a court direction.

What the record answers

The reviewed final notice records the author’s position that no N260 or adequate explanation had been supplied. No substantive reply resolving these points has been provided to this publication. Mr J reports that the requests remain unresolved.

The point still requiring clarification

Identify what was actually before the judge. If the court cannot locate a costs statement, state what searches were made, their result, and the alternative basis recorded for the assessment.

Final notice dated 29 April 2026 · family’s response position updated 15 September 2026. No live “days unanswered” count is used.

Where this question comes from

Court costs: the requests and final notice → Read the originating article

Supporting source notes: R, pp. 1–2.

Mark John Mayo v Miss E / L00BP152

Keep the record complete

Answer this question.

Any party with a response, correction or relevant document can contact theunansweredrecord@gmail.com. Quote COSTS-01 and identify the point and evidence you are addressing. Material replies will be considered and reflected fairly alongside the question.

Respond to COSTS-01 ↗