The question · editorial wording
Did you personally draw the plan sent to Mr Mayo on 28 April 2025? If not, who prepared it?
Why this matters Traceability
A plan should be traceable to its author and source material. That allows its reliability and limitations to be checked. Confirming who sent it does not establish who prepared it: integrity requires that distinction to remain clear.
Current question directed to: Nick Shackson · Estates Specialist · National Grid
- Recipient of the related request in the supplied record
- Nick Shackson
- Related request in record
- 13 February 2026
- Sending of a new request by this publication
- Not recorded; this is the draft reporting register.
Personal-authorship question recorded in Document B, pp. 2–3; chased on 24 February.
What the record answers
The 2 February reply confirms sending the email and plan. It does not establish who drew the plan.
The point still requiring clarification
Miss E asked about personal authorship on 13 February 2026. The earlier reply confirms sending the plan, which is a different point. No direct answer to the later authorship question appears in the supplied bundle.
Related material reviewed through 7 May 2026; no later direct answer established. No live “days unanswered” count is used.
Where this question comes from
Nick Shackson, National Grid and the BH68 plan → Read the originating article
Supporting source notes: B, pp. 2–3.
Other parties mentioned
These connections provide context; they do not establish delivery of this question to every named party.
Keep the record complete
Answer this question.
Any party with a response, correction or relevant document can contact theunansweredrecord@gmail.com. Quote BH68-01 and identify the point and evidence you are addressing. Material replies will be considered and reflected fairly alongside the question.
Respond to BH68-01 ↗