Investigations in the public interestEvidence. Enquiry. Accountability.

Institutional accountability / Expert evidence

Vickery Holman Ltd

Jump to all 1 questions addressed to this recipient →

Surveying firm identified in Dennis Venn’s June 2025 boundary report.

What did the complaint review establish?

The firm’s public response is linked alongside the original complaint and documentary comparisons. Read the dated record →

VENN-13: identify the reviewer, evidence and outcome → · Dennis Venn’s report and questions →

What was examined?

The requested review concerns the full instructions, executed wayleave and plan, participation record and basis for the report’s conclusions. The Part 35 standards → · Source references →

Her refusal was put in writing.

Compare the 13 July objection, Venn’s exact email and the October costs argument → · The question about attribution and reliance →

The complete question index

Questions across the case

1 existing questions addressed to Vickery Holman Ltd. Each link opens its full wording, source and response position.

Filter the full register for this recipient