The referral and its outcome
The signature on the supplied 6 August 2024 reply identifies this operational role. The reply says no current felling licence could be seen and refers the concern to a local Woodland Officer. Read the dated reply
The question seeks the referral record and the promised follow-up, so readers can follow the original complaint through to the inspection and outcome.
1 specific questions
Follow the complaint through.
FOR-14
What happened after the felling complaint was referred?
Your 6 August 2024 email says you could not see a current felling licence, had referred the matter to the local Woodland Officer and would provide an update after review. Identify the referral date, case reference, records and imagery passed on, who received them, and the inspection or review outcome. When and how was the promised update communicated? If the work was treated as licensed or exempt, provide the decision, relevant land and dates, and the records supporting it.
Why it matters: The original complaint and referral should lead to an identifiable review and answer. This question seeks the administrative trail connecting the family’s report to the officer’s visit.
Response record
These questions are published for review and have not yet been sent by The Unanswered Record. There is no publication-request deadline or response recorded.
Responses and corrections: theunansweredrecord@gmail.com. Please identify the question number and supporting document.